Archive for month: January, 2017

While I am not a Buddhist, I find the Tibetan Buddhist teachings on death a source of great wisdom and potential liberation – particularly for those still under the influence of the death taboo in the west.  Sogyal Rinpoche, author of The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying, has a particular skill in drawing out the universal messages of these teachings and making them understandable to the western mind without losing any of their authenticity, purity, and power.  What follows is a summary of his teachings on death and impermanence.*

According to Sogyal Rinpoche, reflections on death and impermanence are the very cornerstone of all spiritual paths.  Among Christian contemplatives, for example, is the expression ‘Memento mori’ – ‘remember that you will die.’ Buddhist teachings encourage awareness of the fact that we could die at any moment.  This helps us to maintain awareness of the preciousness of life and encourages us to sort out our priorities.

From a Buddhist perspective, the root cause of all our suffering, is the fact that we do not take enough time through prayer and meditation to come to know ourselves – our true nature, our enlightened, ‘Buddha’ mind.  Beyond our ordinary everyday mind is our true mind, which radiates the qualities of tremendous light or brilliance (wisdom) and great warmth (love and compassion).  Sogyal Rinpoche uses the analogy of the sky to contrast this state of enlightenment to our everyday mind.  Our daily thoughts, feelings, and actions are like temporary clouds that come and go in an endless sky that, like the enlightened mind, is beyond birth and death.

Coming to know our true nature requires overcoming our ordinary mind and moving past our ego.  In our day-to-day lives, we become absorbed and distracted by our thoughts, feelings and activities.  It is easy to allow our ignorance, negative emotions, and actions to obscure our true nature, much the same way that clouds block our awareness of the endless sky.  We all have the potential to connect beyond our ordinary minds to our deeper state of profound wisdom, love, and compassion.  It is this state of mind that is said to endure past death.  If we do not come to glimpse our true nature in life, we will not be prepared to recognize it and enter into it at death.

This transformation of mind is not only essential preparation for death, but like cleaning the smudges off your eyeglass lenses, it allows us to see more clearly in life in such as way that our very perceptions transform and circumstances will appear differently.  Whether or not we are able to see clearly, it is important to remember that even when our ordinary mind is cloudy, the sky-like nature of mind is still there.  Weather is only on the surface.  Deep in the sky-like nature of our minds it is pure.

In many western spiritual traditions, we use the expression ‘let go and let God.’   Similarly, the Buddhists teach that the essential path to personal transformation and freedom comes from learning to stop grasping after impermanence, for indeed, everything is in a constant state of change. The message of impermanence is that one of the main causes of suffering is grasping and attachment.  Since what we grasp for is impermanent, grasping is an act of futility.

We have to learn to let go.  We don’t have to change – simply change our minds and recognize that impermanence is the very nature and fabric of life itself.  We associate impermanence with losing and death, but when we really understand it  – it is the most secure thing.  When we lose the clouds, we gain the sky.  The most permanent thing is impermanence.  When we realize that, we are made stronger spiritually.

Our fear of death, according to Sogyal Rinpoche, is the fear of life, of facing ourselves.  Looking into death is actually facing ourselves because sooner or later we have to come to terms with ourselves.  That is why we tend to think of death only when we are dying.  However, to look at yourself and your life at death is too little too late where personal transformation is concerned.  That is why Tibetan Buddhist teachings stress that we should always contemplate death and impermanence as a way of breaking through to our true nature.

Rainer Maria Rilke said that our deepest fears are like dragons guarding our deepest treasure.  Our fear of the impermanence of life and all that we grasp after awakens in us an awareness that nothing of this world is real and nothing lasts. Milarepa, a revered Tibetan poet and sage, said it this way – ‘All worldly pursuits have but the one unavoidable end, which is sorrow: acquisitions end in dispersion; buildings in destruction; meetings in separation; births, in death. Knowing this, one should, from the very first, renounce acquisition and heaping up, and building, and meeting; and faithful to the commands of an eminent guru, set about realizing the Truth (which has no birth or death).’

We come to discover that this understanding about impermanence is really our greatest friend. It drives us to ask ‘if everything dies and changes, then what is really true?  Is there something behind the appearances?  Is there something boundless and infinitely spacious in which the dance of change and impermanence takes place?  Is there something, in fact, we can depend on that does survive what we call death?’  When we allow these questions to occupy us urgently and reflect upon them, we slowly find ourselves making a profound shift in the way we view everything.  With continued contemplation and practice in letting go, we come to uncover in ourselves something we cannot name or describe or conceptualize – something we come to realize lies behind all the changes and deaths of the world.  Our myopic focus upon our desires, what we are grasping for, and that which we are trying to avoid, begins to dissolve and fall away.  As this happens, we catch repeated and glowing glimpses of the vast implications behind the truth of impermanence.

Sogyal Rinpoche describes this transformation saying ‘it is as if all our lives we have been flying in an airplane through dark clouds and turbulence when suddenly the plane soars above these into the clear boundless skies.  Inspired and exhilarated by this new dimension of freedom, we come to uncover a depth of peace, joy and confidence in ourselves that fills us with wonder and gradually breeds in us  a certainty that there is in us something that nothing destroys, that nothing alters, and that cannot die.’  He further describes, ‘as the new awareness becomes vivid and almost unbroken, there occurs a personal and utterly non-conceptual revelation of what we are, why we are here, and how we should act which amounts in the end to nothing less than a new life, new birth – almost a resurrection . . . You discover something in yourself that does not die.’

He also speaks of death using the analogy of being on a train platform waiting for a train.  We know that we must take that train but don’t know when it is coming.  We have great anxiety because our bags are not packed.  We do not prepare for death or live thoughtfully because we think we will live forever.  We know we will die someday – but we prefer not to absorb that thought and to pretend instead that we have an unlimited lease on life.

We become lazy in how we live our lives.  The particular kind of laziness in the west is an active one.  We do everything and anything to avoid ourselves.  We fill our lives with so many activities that there is not really a chance for the truth of ourselves to be revealed.  There is no gap.  Yet, we live with an abiding anxiety since we have not faced ourselves or our death.  There is a deep anxiety and a deep fear because death represents our ultimate fear.

Learning to live in the immediacy of death helps us to sort out our priorities and to realize what is truly important in life.  We learn that there is really not much time to waste.  Death helps us to look into our life in a deeper way.  We come to realize that only two things really matter when we die – how we have lived and the state of our mind.  When we take care of those most important things, then we can relax.  Milarepa said ‘my religion is not to be ashamed of myself when I die.’

An unenlightened mind sees death as defeat – a tragedy.  These teachings show us it is really an extraordinary opportunity for transformation and personal liberation.  When we die, it is only the end of one cycle finishing – the delusions of this life will end if we allow it.  However, those who hold tight to their illusions don’t allow for their liberation to take place. Those who allow it not only surrender to the death of their bodies but they allow their ordinary mind to die with all its delusions as well.  Milarepa described it this way: ‘In horror of death, I took to the mountains. Meditating again and again on the uncertainty of the hour of death, I captured the fortress of the deathless unending nature of mind.  Now all fear of death is done and gone.’

Tibetan Buddhist teachings provide three pieces of advice for the moment of death which also serve practitioners well in how to live their lives: let go of all graspings, attachments, and aversions; keep your heart and mind pure; and unite your mind with the wisdom mind of the buddhas.  Those practicing these techniques in life who are really able to let go inside themselves, find they are able to cope better with outer stress and are less bothered or worried by what transpires in their life.  When we stabilize and integrate this view as part of our being through meditation and through action then we can meet death fearlessly.  By practicing getting into the high ground of our consciousness during life through meditation and contemplation, we prepare ourselves for the moment of death.

There is also advice given for those who are helping the dying.  Essentially, we are called upon to simply be there maintaining a consciousness of unconditional loving – free of attachments.  Love is not expressed by grasping after the life of the dying.  This kind of attachment, Sogyal Rinpoche teaches, is actually what spoils love.  To truly realize love for one another, we have to let go.  When a loved one is dying, we can best serve them by giving them our permission and blessing to die and by surrounding them with our love and encouragement.

*This article is based on the teachings of Sogyal Rinpoche presented in The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying and the following four lectures: Transcending All Fear of Death; The Essence of The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying (parts one and two); and Reflecting on Death.

I was recently on a panel discussion on HuffPost Live about the reality of death and how it can test our faith. We were discussing a post by a teenager named Alice who eloquently expressed her mental and emotional reaction to death and her rage at God for the death of people she cared about. It reminded me how essential it is to take a look at our own assumptions and demands about God and what kind of relationship we have with God.

Our fundamental assumptions and beliefs about the existence or nonexistence of God and what kind of god we imagine informs how we live our life. Like Alice, people of all ages rage at God for not conforming to their expectations of what and how God should be. Alice said “…but there’s something about sitting at the funerals of people who were close to me that makes me want to kill God.”

So, how do we kill God? And then what happens? This kind of rage at God is essentially a mental construct. Let’s use the example of turning against God when someone you love dies. The typical sequence of events goes something like this: We attribute the occurrence that we did not like or understand to God. We then decide that the intensity of the grief or hurt we experience is incompatible with the actions of a loving God. We conclude that God therefore cannot be loving or worthy of our belief. We resolve the tension between reality and our beliefs by rejecting God. The only thing this really accomplishes is to make us feel more in control of the situation. We fire the inadequate god of our imagination and take on the job of god ourselves. But what “god” are we getting rid of: God or the god of our imagination?

When we demand that “God” make sense to us we are dealing with a very small god. This is a god limited by the human mind, imagination and perceptual capabilities. It is a god in our image. In the grander scheme of the vast and complex universe we inhabit and those that lie beyond our knowledge, that’s a very puny god.

What if God were so beyond our capacity to comprehend or talk about that the only valid response was what Rudolf Otto, author of “The Mysterium Tremendum,” refers to as drop jaw awe? What if everything that happens is somehow perfect for all involved? What if God is really worthy of our awe, gratitude and love? What if the real problem is not God, but rather our limited thinking?

The questions of God’s existence or nature and the spiritual dimension of life are the most profound inquiries we can explore. It is an adventure of the heart, body, mind and soul in a maze filled with shortcuts and dead ends. Many reach the dead end of demanding satisfactory proof of God’s existence and perceiving none conclude that God does not exist. Others, like myself, can’t get past the glory and beauty and wonder of a tree and spend a lifetime seeking a deeper attunement with God. This is not a quest for the faint of heart, but for me, the blessings have been magnificent.

I like telling people that I don’t believe in God. The truth is that after many years of intentionally focusing on building my awareness of God, a life-threatening car accident in 1997 brought me over the threshold from belief in God to knowing God’s existence and presence in my life. My knowledge of God is beyond words, or my mind, and is not transferable to others. I consider it a blessing beyond anything else I could imagine receiving in my life. My primary identity has transitioned from that of a woman with certain mental, emotional and physical characteristics to knowing myself as a divine being having a human experience as that woman.

I don’t think any of us should settle for a god that is unworthy of our love and awe. So, if your god seems too small for you, consider exploring the following questions:

  • How do you define God?
  • What assumptions do you make about God?
  • What limitations do you place on God? For example, do you think you should always be happy or that people, especially children, shouldn’t die?
  • Is God a mental concept to you or a guiding force in how you live your life?
  • What kind of relationship do you have with God?
  • What would make your relationship with God better than it is now?
  • What do you think is the purpose of your life?
  • What would have to change for you to know God?

I don’t think anyone is “right” or “wrong” based on what they believe or don’t believe about God. Each of us is wherever we are on these matters and that is our personal truth. However, I do think the question of God’s existence and nature is worthy of our personal attention and exploration. We owe it to each other to respect our differences in this regard for indeed, if I stood in your shoes or you stood in mine we each would see what the other sees — that’s the irony of it all.

 

Please feel free to leave a comment below or to email me at judithjohnson@hvc.rr.com.

Also, if you know anyone who might get value from this article please email or tweet it or share it on Facebook.

If you would like to suggest a topic for a future blog or ask me to address a particular situation or issue, please email at the address above and I will see what I can do.

When I was ordained as an interfaith minister in 1985, I was charged with the responsibility of ministering to all regardless of race, creed, color, situation, circumstance, or environment — in other words, to serve without prejudice. Isn’t this what we should really be asking of our “public servants” — i.e. politicians and elected officials who are seeking to influence the laws of “our” land? I am personally delighted that the issue of gay marriage is challenging how our social norms and laws attempt to disempower and limit the freedom of those who are being marginalized — i.e. rejected instead of respected as fellow members of our society.

By ruling on the gay marriage, our Supreme Court is being asked to honor a higher authority than the personal preferences of those who are most influential in getting our elected officials re-elected. In fact the agenda is twofold. First is to legitimize the legal right for gay couples to have access to all the mental, emotional, spiritual, legal, financial, and social benefits of marriage. In addition, it also challenges the authority previously held by lawmakers and social norms to legalize prejudice against a group of citizens who are not considered representative of the preferences of the power brokers of our society. This is simultaneously an issue of the legal rights of a marginalized group and a matter of serving notice to our public servants that they are responsible for serving all of us — not just those they prefer.

The bottom line issue here is not whether or not gay marriage should be recognized, but whether or not our system should condone and legalize prejudice. I believe that nothing is more important here than loving, honoring, respecting, and serving one another. It is time for us to turn this issue inside out and ask ourselves what right do we have to marginalize one another?

Consider these words from Sample Ceremony #3: Celebrating Our Oneness While Honoring Our Differences in the second edition of my book, The Wedding Ceremony Planner: The Essential Guide to the Most Important Part of Your Wedding Day:

For over twenty years, I have been officiating wedding ceremonies for all kinds of couples.One thing that has always impressed me
is that when a couple’s union challenges
what we are used to,
we are presented with the choice
to either rise to this challenge
or to hold tight to our limiting beliefs.

Whether bridging the gap between
different races, cultures, religions, or age groups,
or being more similar than we are used to
as in couples of the same gender,
these couples have a freedom
that many of us lack.
They are available to love
regardless of race, creed, color,
situation, circumstance, or environment.
There are no walls around their hearts
that prevent them from allowing
love to occur. . .

What an interesting lesson for the rest of us.
How would our individual and collective lives
be different if our hearts were also unbound
by rules and beliefs that we must only love others
who are quite like us, but then, not too much like us?

I celebrate . . . all couples who challenge us to unbind our hearts
and render ourselves vulnerable
to the power and possibilities of love.

 

May we rise to the best that is within us in responding to this challenge.